Why Your Startup Needs an Architecture Audit Before Series B

You shipped your MVP in three months. Customers love it. Revenue is growing. You're hiring engineers faster than you can onboard them.

Then everything starts slowing down.

Features that used to take a week now take three. Deployments break in mysterious ways. Your best engineer just quit because "the codebase is a mess." Sound familiar?

The patterns I see over and over

After auditing 20+ startup codebases, I've noticed the same problems keep showing up right around the 10-15 engineer mark:

1. The monolith that nobody understands

Your app started as a single service. That was the right call — monoliths are great for moving fast. But now it's 200k lines of code and nobody knows which module depends on what.

// This is fine at 5 engineers
import { sendEmail } from '../../../utils/email';
import { validateUser } from '../../auth/helpers';
import { calculatePrice } from '../billing/internals';

// At 15 engineers, these cross-cutting imports become a nightmare

The fix isn't "switch to microservices." It's establishing module boundaries within your monolith using tools like Nx workspace libraries or NestJS modules with clear public APIs.

2. Authentication sprawl

Your auth logic started in one middleware file. Then someone added API key support. Then OAuth. Then you needed different permissions for different endpoints. Now auth checks are scattered across 40 files and nobody's confident they're all consistent.

// Before: auth logic scattered everywhere
router.get('/api/users', (req, res) => {
  if (!req.user) return res.status(401).send('Unauthorized');
  if (!req.user.roles.includes('admin')) return res.status(403).send('Forbidden');
  // ...business logic mixed with auth
});

// After: centralized with OpenFGA or similar
@UseGuards(AuthGuard, PermissionGuard('users:read'))
@Get('/api/users')
async getUsers() {
  // Pure business logic
}

3. CI/CD that takes 45 minutes

Your pipeline runs every test on every PR. It made sense when you had 200 tests. Now you have 2,000 and your developers are context-switching while waiting for CI.

The solution is usually a combination of:

• Affected-only testing with Nx or Turborepo
• Parallel test execution across CI runners
• Smarter caching of build artifacts and dependencies

I've seen teams go from 45 minutes to 6 minutes with these changes alone.

When to do the audit

The best time is before you need it urgently. Specifically:

• Before a hiring sprint — new engineers amplify existing problems
• Before a funding round — technical due diligence is real
• When velocity starts declining — don't wait until it's painful

What an audit actually looks like

It's not someone reading your code for two days and handing you a 50-page PDF. A good audit is collaborative:

1. Day 1: I pair with your team leads, trace through critical paths, review your CI/CD pipeline, and identify the highest-impact issues
2. Day 2: We build a prioritized roadmap together — what to fix now, what to fix next quarter, and what to leave alone
3. Follow-up: A 30-minute call two weeks later to review progress and unblock any issues

The goal isn't perfection. It's knowing which problems to solve first and having a concrete plan to solve them.

---

If this resonates, book a free 30-minute call and let's talk about your specific situation. No pitch, no obligation — just a conversation about what's slowing your team down.